grant & co
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Jobs
    • Grant Writer
    • Business Analyst
    • Project Manager
    • SDR
    • AI Prompt Engineer
    • Partner
  • Podcast
  • Fundraising Secrets
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Jobs
    • Grant Writer
    • Business Analyst
    • Project Manager
    • SDR
    • AI Prompt Engineer
    • Partner
  • Podcast
  • Fundraising Secrets
Search

How Grantors can get better investees (and take less time doing it)

2/5/2020

0 Comments

 
Many grantors I talk to complain that they can't get enough applicants. So we created a post on how grantors can improve the quality of the applicants they receive.
  • Create an efficient way to manage the application process with software:
    • Submittable
    • Foundant: https://www.softwareadvice.com/nonprofit/grantmakers-profile/
    • Fluxx: https://www.softwareadvice.com/nonprofit/fluxx-profile/
    • Others; https://www.softwareadvice.com/nonprofit/grant-management-comparison/p/all/?segments=457
  • Raise awareness
    • Retargetting your website visitors with Google Ads
    • Google provides up to $10k per month to non-profits so consider getting a GoogleAds Grant
    • Promote your grant on LinkedIn to your target audience
  • Target specific grantees with email campaigns. They can be found at:
    • Global Innovation Exchange
    • Impact Alpha
    • Winners of similar grants in the past
  • Make the application more attractive to the best entrepreneurs
    • Have shorter first round applications
      • Great organizations are busy and they prioritize their time such that they prefer short application to a long one
    • Give information on grant that enables an entrepreneur to determine if they want to apply. When I’m applying to a grant I want to see how big the award is and how many are given to determine if it’s worth my while. More awards means more chances. I also check to see how quickly they will make the award. Some grantor say on their website: the award will be made in 6 months. If it doesn’t I check to see what the grantors track record is. If they previously had a deadline in January but didn’t announce the winners until December most likely it is going to take 12 months again for them to make an award.
    • When I apply for a grant I always try to reach out to previous winners to see what their experience was like. Sometimes they say the paperwork and delays made the award not worthwhile. Once I had a funder wait two months to send us our grant because their check signer was “on vacation” (on top of the 12 months we already waited) and we nearly went out of business. I can’t recommend working with them in the future.
  • Check your rating on GrantAdvisor.org, on Google Maps or on Facebook
    • The best grantees check your rating to see if you'd be good to work with
    • Solicit feedback for your organization from grantees: http://funderfeedback.org/
  • Raise your profile
    • PR audit (compare yourself to Gates Foundation, Rockefeller, Ford, UKAID, USAID, GIZ, Shell Foundation, or whoever is in your sector) compare your 
  • Things not to do
    • Go to conferences (it takes lots of time)
    • Physical road shows (also lots of time and $$$)
    • Print ads (unless they are hyper targeted like an ad in a local newspaper for a geographically specific grant)
0 Comments

12 months to better grant writing 2 of 12: is the juice worth the squeeze?

2/5/2020

3 Comments

 
Ever wanted to know whether it was a good idea to apply for a grant? Is it worthwhile? Many people come up with sweeping conclusions that “all grants are a crap shoot” or “grants are good because they are free money.” But the truth is more subtle and I don’t think anyone has published work on this before.

There are many dimensions of whether a grant is worthwhile. What are the chances of winning? Is the prize worth the effort? Once you win will their be so much bureaucracy that the juice isn’t worth the squeeze, as they say?​

Picture
I remember winning a grant for my biogas company several years ago. We were so excited. And then it took 18 to get the money. We were almost out of business by then. And we had only survived because I stopped taking a salary for a few months.

Whether to apply for a grant seems like more art than science. However, I think that we can quantify this.

Any time you take on a new project one way to think about it is ROI. If you spend $1,000 on ads, how many sales are you going to get. We can do the same for grants. I’m calling the metric of how worthwhile it is to apply for a grant the GrantROI. 

Nuts and Bolts
I’ll explain the formula here. Feel free to skip to Results below if it is too detailed.
  • GrantROI = Expected_Value/Cost of applying.

Where
  • CostOfApplying = yourTime*yourHourlyRate + GrantWriterTime*HourlyRate

and 

  • ExpectedValue = (GrantAmount-GrantCommissions+NonMonetaryGrantValue-ImplementationCost)*ChancesOfWinning*(1-InterestRate)^TimeDelay

Let me dig into a few of these variables.
​

TimeDelay. Because time is money, you’d rather have the money now than 18 months from now when you might be out of business. This is the delay between the application deadline and the day the winner gets cash in the bank. There is a way to account for this using a Net Present Value calculation which you can read about on wikipedia.
To figure out how much to discount future cash flows you use an interest rate. Typically the prevailing bank interest rate (let’s say 16% in Kenya) plus an additional factor for the added risk you experience as a startup, perhaps an additional 10-20%.

The NonMonetaryGrantValue is usually zero, but in the case of a startup accelerator most of the value might be in the network you make rather than the cash they award you.

YourTime and GrantWriterTime is how long it will take to complete the application. I broke down each application into parts and figured out how many hours I would bill a client to complete the application and set YourTime to 10 hours for each application for general oversight and editing my proposal. Clearly this formula rewards grantors for having shorter applications.

ImplementationCosts is an especially important factor. If a grantor awards you $100,000 but expects you to conduct M&E activities and reporting that will cost you $90,000 the grant is obviously not worth it. That's just too many hoops to jump through.
Picture
Chances of winning can be derived from previous calls for proposals from the same Grantor or from their annual report where they say “we received x applicants and gave y awards.”

There are other features that I thought of including in the formula which might make it into the next version such as whether the grantor provides feedback on rejected applications (which is a non-Monetary value) and whether the grantor hosts multiple rounds which enables applicants to improve their application from one year to the next. Whether grantors respond in a timely manner was another factor I considered, but that can be part of the ImplementationCosts variable as timeliness should decrease ImplementationCosts. The general idea would be to reward all good behavior of grantors so that more are better to work with.

Results

So what are the best grants to apply for and what are the worst?
Picture
The results are pretty clear. Some grants are clearly not worth applying to. For any grant with a GrantROI of less than 1 it means that the grantor is adding less dollars to the sector than it is sucking out in terms of applicants' time.

This GrantROI is only correct for the average applicant. Perhaps your application is an especially good fit or you have a personal connection that increases your chances. That would increase your GrantROI.

Furthermore, you are not a lottery ticket. Just because you submit an application doesn’t give you a fixed probability of winning; a lot depends on the quality of the application. So GrantROI is not a silverbullet solution to determine whether you should apply. But! I hope this is a useful tool as a first step.
​

Just as US News and World Report publishes an annual college ranking, I hope we can make a grantor ranking. This could create more accountability for grantors to have entrepreneur-friendly applications.
Picture
Picture
If you have data points for other grantors you’d like me to add let me know by email or by commenting on this post. If you know of a good place to publicly host a ranking wiki let me know as well so that other people can edit this list with more updated info.

To use this tool (and other tools I developed) click here.
3 Comments

    Author

    Kyle founded Grant&Co after running a biogas company in Kenya for 5 years. We raised a lot of grant capital there. And now we help other entrepreneurs raise capital.

    Archives

    November 2022
    June 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    October 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020

    Categories

    All
    Grant Writing
    Lead Generation
    PR Audit

    RSS Feed

Our Mission: Make an entrepreneur's search for funding as easy as finding an Airbnb by 2040.

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Jobs
    • Grant Writer
    • Business Analyst
    • Project Manager
    • SDR
    • AI Prompt Engineer
    • Partner
  • Podcast
  • Fundraising Secrets